“While the F.B.I.’s standard practice is not to discuss its sources and methods, it is important to understand that sources provide valuable information regarding criminal activity and national security matters,” the bureau said. said that intelligence gathering was central to its mission of protecting the American people and upholding the Constitution. 6th never happens again,” he said during the congressional hearing. “Anytime there’s an attack, especially one that’s this horrific, that strikes right at the heart of our system of government, right at the time the transfer of power is being discussed, you can be darn tootin’ that we are focused very, very hard on how can we get better sources, better information, better analysis so that we can make sure that something like what happened on Jan. was studying the quality of the intelligence it had gathered about Jan. Wray, the bureau’s director, acknowledged to Congress in March that the F.B.I. also had an additional informant with ties to another Proud Boys chapter that took part in the sacking of the Capitol, according to a person familiar with the matter, raising questions about the quality of the bureau’s informants and what sorts of questions they were being asked by their handlers before Jan. officials in Washington were alerted in advance of the attack that the informant was traveling to the Capitol with several other Proud Boys. Moreover, the records indicate that F.B.I. 6 and asked the informant to make contact with them, suggesting that they might be Proud Boys. was investigating at least two other participants in the rally on Jan. The records - provided to The Times on the condition that they not be directly quoted - show the F.B.I. in tracking the threat from far-right groups like the Proud Boys. They also raise new questions about the performance of the F.B.I. before, during and after the riot - dovetail with assertions made by defense lawyers who have argued that even though several Proud Boys broke into the Capitol, the group did not arrive in Washington with a preset plot to storm the building. 6 - excerpts from his interviews and communications with the F.B.I. The records describing the informant’s account of Jan. ![]() The informant’s identity was not disclosed in the records. ![]() In lengthy interviews, the records say, he also denied that the extremist organization planned in advance to storm the Capitol. 6, and for months after, the records show, the informant, who was affiliated with a Midwest chapter of the Proud Boys, denied that the group intended to use violence that day. ![]() 6 by the leadership of the Proud Boys, why he was cooperating, whether he could have missed indications of a plot or whether he could have deliberately misled the government.īut the records, and information from two people familiar with the matter, suggest that federal law enforcement had a far greater visibility into the assault on the Capitol, even as it was taking place, than was previously known.Īt the same time, the new information is likely to complicate the government’s efforts to prove the high-profile conspiracy charges it has brought against several members of the Proud Boys. In this case, the records obtained by The Times do not directly address whether the informant was in a good position to know about plans developed for Jan. The use of informants always presents law enforcement officials with difficult judgments about the credibility and completeness of the information they provide. At one point, his handler appeared not to grasp that the building had been breached, the records show, and asked the informant to keep him in the loop - especially if there was any violence. In the informant’s version of events, the Proud Boys, famous for their street fights, were largely following a pro-Trump mob consumed by a herd mentality rather than carrying out any type of preplanned attack.Īfter meeting his fellow Proud Boys at the Washington Monument that morning, the informant described his path to the Capitol grounds where he saw barriers knocked down and Trump supporters streaming into the building, the records show. In the middle of an unfolding melee that shook a pillar of American democracy - the peaceful transfer of power - the bureau had an informant in the crowd, providing an inside glimpse of the action, according to confidential records obtained by The New York Times. 6, one member of the far-right group was busy texting a real-time account of the march. As scores of Proud Boys made their way, chanting and shouting, toward the Capitol on Jan.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |